The Home Minister will tour border areas of Rajasthan and will visit border outposts to asses the situation along the Indo-Pak border..During the two-day visit, Singh will hold meetings with top BSF officials and chair meetings with https://www.hokimould.com/product/stool-chairs-mould/ Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti, Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani, Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje and Punjab Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal, officials said.Elaborate arrangements are being made for the visit, he said.During the two-day visit, Singh will hold meetings with top BSF officials and chair meetings with CMs of several states. Jaisalmer: Home Minister Rajnath Singh will arrive in Jaisalmer on Friday to review the security situation along the Indo-Pak border with Chief Ministers of four states whose boundaries touch Pakistan and top Border Security Force (BSF) officials.Barmer Collector Sudhir Sharma said the Home Minister will hold meeting with BSF officials in Barmer on October 8.

". Venkaiah Naidu, to urge the Chair not to allow the motion to be taken up as it referred to a matter that was a state subject, deputy chairman P.The PM, in his reply to the debate on the motion of thanks, said: "I will appeal to the members, trusting the President’s vision, withdraw the amendments and pass the motion of thanks unanimously.J.
There is no harm in putting it to vote. Interestingly, none of the Bahujan Samaj Party members were present in the House at the time of voting even though its head, Ms Mayawati, was present during the Prime Minister’s speech.In 2015, CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury had moved a motion regretting that there was no mention of corruption and https://www.hokimould.com/product/daily-necessities-mould/storage-box-mould/ black money in the President’s speech.Mr Ghulam Nabi Azad moved the amendment with reference to the education qualifications set for panchayat elections in Haryana and Rajasthan. There is also a valid explanation why these things be not there (sic).The amendment was pushed through despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s appeal to the Upper House to pass the motion without any amendment, as per tradition. Kurien, who was in the Chair, gave a ruling after claims and counter-claims from both sides, and said, "This is only a concern of members.J.Deputy chairman P. The two states were not mentioned in the motion.
The amendment regretted that the address did not commit support to rights of all citizens to contest Panchayat elections in the backdrop of the law in Rajasthan and Haryana where matriculation has been fixed as the criteria for contesting the polls.The Narendra Modi government faced embarrassment in the Rajya Sabha for the second year in a row as the Opposition forced an amendment to the motion of thanks to the President’s address.Mr Azad, during the course of the debate, had asked the Centre to bring in legislation to roll back the provision on minimum educational qualifications, made mandatory for fighting panchayat elections in Rajasthan and Haryana." However, that was not to be.Despite several attempts by the government, including by Union finance minister Arun Jaitley and parliamentary affairs minister M. The amendment was then passed by the Upper House after a division that involved electronic voting.This was objected to by Mr Azad and other Opposition members, including Mr Yechury, who claimed it was well within the right of the House to pass it as it was only a concern expressed by members. Kurien permitted it as it did not refer to any state.Mr Modi, in his reply, snubbed Mr Azad and said the parties protesting against the imposition of minimum qualifications should give 30 per cent tickets to illiterate candidates in the coming Assembly polls (in Assam, West Bengal, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry) He also said it is not in the jurisdiction of this House to discuss any matter covered by state legislatures. The Upper House adopted the Motion of Thanks to President’s Address with an amendment moved by Leader of the Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad in a division in which 94 voted for the amendment and 61 against.

Many sharing the clip online inquired if the panellist was okay, while others slammed the anchor for his hilarious reaction. @mazhar_barlas sir ap kay lagi tw nahi ziada ??@GTVNetworkHD jani wtf

The Upper House saw three adjournments before the Chair finally called it a day, a little after 3pm following continued uproar and slogan-shouting.As the members protested, Naidu said there cannot be any discussion on the decision of the Chair.
Try to understand this. Thereafter, the Prime Minister introduced new ministers to the House.. I have no problem," he said, adding "this is not the manner. I have not allowed.. ...pls sit down.Congress leader Anand Sharma also got up and said Agarwal was trying to raise a point of order and asked whether this could be raised "only at a particular time"..Both the sides are standing.The opposition members also protested the disqualification of former JD(U) chief Sharad Yadav and Ali Anwar of the same party from the House by the Chairman, which was vociferously countered by ruling party MPs. many foreign secretaries, high commissioners and ambassadors. Please sit down. charges have been levelled on them that they are hatching a conspiracy with Pakistan in Gujarat election... "There is no discussion on the ruling of the chairman...They raised the issue soon after the Chairman informed the House about his decision to disqualify the two former JD(U) members after giving them due opportunity of hearing...Later in the day, parliamentary affairs minister Ananth Kumar said it’s the Congress that should apologise over its leaders meeting Pakistan officials."When the House reassembled at noon for Question Hour, Leader of Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad raised the issue of Modi’s remarks at an election rally in Gujarat targeting Singh over a dinner meeting with Pakistani diplomats. There is a saying that all is well, not well."As opposition members continued slogan-shouting and trooped into the Well, Naidu said "You want to do like this on the first day itself? I don’t appreciate the conduct of coming to the Well.Earlier when the House assembled, Chairman Naidu led the House in paying tributes to 10 former members who passed away during the inter-session period.Azad said his party and other opposition leaders have given a notice under rule 267 seeking suspension of the listed business to discuss an issue which he termed as "serious".Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Vijay Goel asked how the issue being raised was a point or order, which, he said, was related to the business of the House."This agitated the members who created further uproar, forcing the Chair to adjourn the House till 2:30pmWhen the House met again, Azad raised the issue amid the uproar and the House was adjourned again till 3pm by deputy chairman PJ Kurien.As the slogan shouting continued, Kurien adjourned the proceedings till 3pm..Meanwhile, several Congress members were on their feet by this time and started raising slogans demanding an apology from the prime minister for his remarks..Chairman M Venkaiah Naidu disallowed a notice by Congress https://www.hokimould.com/product/daily-necessities-mould/storage-box-mould/ and other opposition members under rule 267 for suspension of the business of the House to discuss the matter, which led to further noisy scenes....""
This is a political issue which you are raising, which you discuss outside the House.against a former PM, vice president and Army chief," Azad said.While Kurien pleaded with members to take up the private members’ business, Samajwadi Party member Naresh Agarwal raised the issue of the Centre’s move to set up special courts for cases against MPs and MLAs and questioned the move.I have not allowed it . This is not an ordinary allegation.But Naidu disallowed it, saying "I have gone into the notice given by Ghulam Nabiji, Naresh Agarwal. When the House reassembled, opposition members continued their protests, forcing Kurien to adjourn the House for the day. One allegation has been levelled on former Prime Minister and former President..Amid the din, some private members’ bills including ‘The Educational Innovations Commission Bill 2017’ by Vinay Sahasrabuddhe and ‘The Prevention of Enforced Disappearance Bill 2017’ by V Vijayasai Reddy were introduced. The PM on December 10 in Palampur in Gujarat has levelled this allegation.
All are standing.When Kurien said it was a decision of the Supreme Court, Agarwal said he had not criticised the top court but his questions were directed at the government.."There has been a serious matter which is not only the concern of government but the opposition is equally concerned."There are charges .New Delhi: An angry opposition led by the Congress accused Modi of levelling "serious charges" against Singh, former vice president Hamid Ansari and diplomats.Several Congress members including Oscar Fernandes, Shamsher Singh Dullo, Renuka Chowdhury, Sanjay Singh trooped into the Well of the House shouting slogans.